…are you of or from the "general consensus[concensus]"…?


User:General concensus2012
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
General Philosophy of this user

If the World of “homo sapiens” depended solely on what the general consensus(concensus) of Science was, we could all end up being some kind of biased inferior humans of some sort, with obtuse minds! Not always the main stream of humans, Governments, and Academia, can be relied on! Why would we all be so naive! How long would new information and work be considered as material for history and wikipedia make reference to? I would suppose as to the importance of the source it came from! Well so they say!

How long can something be of common knowledge? Well I have a book 150 years old, that is available online, and University Libraries of U.S.A. might still have it, but there is no mention of it at wikipedia. And it is vital logic! {{–General concensus2012 (talk) 03:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)}}
I only want to say yes to everything

I only want to say yes to everything, or merely suggest nothing new! Controversial themes are so, because of their origin and biased interests of “obtuse minds”! {{–General concensus2012 (talk) 03:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)}}
All welcome to Wikipedia

Wikipedia is the “only” available main source of information online of its kind, and generally it is “un-biased”!{{–General concensus2012 (talk) 03:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)}}


I love logic and simply being here on Earth as a savvy human

Logic is how we humans think. If it is not logical, then it is questionable. Thanks.{{–General concensus2012 (talk) 03:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)}}